Evaluasi Implementasi Micro Teaching Berbasis TPACK dengan Model CIPP pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sebelas Maret
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69836/ncrcs-sinesia.v2i1.191Keywords:
Micro teaching, TPACK, CIPP, Physics education, Pre-service teacherAbstract
Calon guru fisika di era digital dituntut mampu mengintegrasikan teknologi, pedagogik, dan konten secara terpadu dalam pembelajaran. Namun, mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sebelas Maret masih menghadapi kendala dalam menyusun RPP berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka dan mengintegrasikan teknologi secara pedagogis dalam micro teaching. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi implementasi micro teaching berbasis TPACK menggunakan model CIPP. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods dengan desain concurrent embedded, melibatkan 60 mahasiswa melalui angket, wawancara dengan 7 mahasiswa dan 3 dosen, observasi langsung, serta analisis dokumen. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan dimensi context sangat baik, dengan 96,7% mahasiswa memahami tujuan program dan 98,3% menyatakan kesesuaiannya dengan kebutuhan calon guru. Aspek input mencerminkan kesiapan RPP yang tinggi (93,3%) dan pemanfaatan teknologi seperti PhET dan Canva (90,0%), meskipun terdapat kendala teknis pada infrastruktur. Dimensi process menonjol pada penutupan pembelajaran (88,3%) dan umpan balik dosen (91,7%), namun manajemen waktu (78,3%) dan integrasi TPACK secara holistik masih perlu ditingkatkan. Hasil product menunjukkan peningkatan keterampilan mengajar (83,3%) dan kepercayaan diri (85,0%), meskipun ditemukan miskonsepsi pada konten fisika dan kecenderungan pendekatan teacher-centered. Evaluasi CIPP menyimpulkan bahwa konteks dan produk program telah memenuhi harapan, sementara aspek input dan proses masih memerlukan penguatan. Disarankan pengembangan modul simulasi daring, penguatan pelatihan TPACK, panduan RPP yang lebih sistematis, serta umpan balik terstruktur guna mempersiapkan calon guru menghadapi tantangan pembelajaran abad ke-21.
References
Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK-practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3495–8528.
Caeli, E. N., & Bundsgaard, J. (2020). Computational thinking in compulsory education: a survey study on initiatives and conceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09694-z
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 31–51.
Durdu, L., & Dag, F. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK development and conceptions through a TPACK-based course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42 (11), 150–171.
Ekawati, E. Y., & Prastyo, A. (2022). Optimization of TPACK-based Project Learning in Micro-teaching Courses in Physics Education Study Programs during the Pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2392(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2392/1/012035
Greene, M., Cheng, S.-L., & Jones, M. (2023). Preservice Teachers’ Technology Integration Knowledge Development in an Online Technology-Based Course. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16423a
Guzmán González, J. R., & Vesga Bravo, G. J. (2024). TPACK in in-service secondary education teachers: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12 (1), 1–22.
Jiménez Sierra, Á. A., Ortega Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913
Kim, H., Song, J., & Ha, S. (2024). TPACK expression patterns in preservice teachers’ design of innovative physics teaching and learning materials. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1552–1566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12965
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60–70.
Leung, S. K. Y., Yip, R. O. W., & Li, J. W. (2024). Exploring preservice ECE teachers’ TPACK through digital storytelling during the pandemic. Early Child Development and Care, 194(9–10), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2024.2395381
Mgeladze, A., & Kapanadze, M. (2025). Integrating TPACK and collaborative learning to enhance technological proficiency in physics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(8), em2681. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16715
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Rayhan, A., & Pramesty, W. A. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI TERHADAP MINAMATA CONVENTION ON MERCURY DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Mengenai Pencemaran Merkuri Dan Arsen Di Teluk Buyat). Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 2(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1.19111
Rayhan, A., Widjaya, R., & Lita, T. (2023). Partisipasi NGO Pandawara Group Dalam Mengelola Lingkungan Di Pantai Teluk Labuan Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Welfare State. Proceeding: 5TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE on Law Studies , 5(1), 31–54.
Rinla, R., McGarr, O., & Murphy, C. (2025). Exploring TPACK in pre-service science teacher education: Perceptions versus practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 178–196.
Sankaran, S., & Saad, N. (2022). Evaluating the Bachelor of Education Program Based on the Context, Input, Process, and Product Model. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924374
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (2), 123–149.
Shambare, B., & Jita, T. (2024). Understanding science teachers’ TPACK for virtual lab adoption in rural schools in South Africa: a mixed-methods approach. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1426451
Stinken-Rösner, L., Hofer, E., Rodenhauser, A., & Abels, S. (2023). Technology Implementation in Pre-Service Science Teacher Education Based on the Transformative View of TPACK: Effects on Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK, Behavioral Orientations and Actions in Practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070732
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., & Williams, J. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15 (4), 57–84.
Zhou, G., Xu, J., & Martinovic, D. (2016). Developing Pre-service Teachers’ Capacity in Teaching Science with Technology Through Microteaching Lesson Study Approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00605a
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novananda Syakira Eka Putri, Dr. Elvin Yusliana Ekawati, S.Pd., M.Pd. (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
