Public Law as Incentive Architecture: Rethinking Legal Design for Policy Uptake in Civil Service Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69836/ncrcs-sinesia.v1i1.24Keywords:
Behavioral Law and Economics, Civil Service Reform, Legal Design and Institutional Incentives, Public Sector Compliance, Path Dependency and Bureaucratic BehaviorAbstract
This study examines why legal mandates in Indonesia’s civil service reform—despite being embedded in strong formal frameworks such as Law No. 5/2014—often fail to drive behavioral change among public officials. The objective is to investigate the cognitive, motivational, and institutional barriers that undermine legal compliance and to propose an alternative legal design grounded in behavioral insights. Methods: The research applies a Behavioral Law and Economics (BLE) approach through qualitative-descriptive analysis, combining doctrinal legal interpretation with institutional case studies across government agencies. Data is drawn from secondary sources, regulatory reviews, and literature on bureaucratic behavior and public policy compliance. Results: Findings show that regulatory failure is not merely technical but behavioral. Legal norms—such as merit-based recruitment, electronic performance systems, and open promotion—are often implemented symbolically. Barriers include regulatory overload, status quo bias, loss aversion, informal norms that compete with formal law, and political interference that distorts incentives. These dynamics result in path dependency and ritualistic compliance that weaken reform outcomes. Conclusions: This study proposes a reconceptualization of public law as incentive architecture, integrating nudges, defaults, and behavioral feedback into regulatory design. It recommends the reformulation of priority legal provisions, pilot testing of BLE-based interventions in civil service institutions, and the establishment of a behavioral legal design unit under the Ministry of Administrative Reform. Ultimately, the law’s effectiveness depends not on command-and-control logic but on its capacity to align with human cognition, motivation, and institutional context—allowing law to guide behavior intelligently and sustainably.
References
Appiah, D., & Abdulai, A. G. (2017). Competitive clientelism and the politics of core public sector reform in Ghana.
Barsoum, G. (2018). Egypt’s many public administration transitions: Reform vision and implementation challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(10), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1308433
Bezes, P., & Lodge, M. (2015). Civil service reforms, public service bargains and dynamics of institutional change. In A. Massey (Ed.), Comparative civil service systems in the 21st century (pp. 136–161). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bezzina, F., Camilleri, E., & Marmarà, V. (2021). Civil service systems and HRM public service reforms. In F. Bezzina, E. Camilleri, & V. Marmarà (Eds.), Public service reforms in a small island state: The case of Malta (pp. 105–124).
Bukenya, B., & Muhumuza, W. (2017). The politics of core public sector reform in Uganda: Behind the façade. Effective States and Inclusive Development Working Paper, 85.
Clark, D. (2000). Public service reform: A comparative West European perspective. West European Politics, 23(3), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425378
De Schutter, O., & Lenoble, J. (Eds.). (2010). Reflexive governance: Redefining the public interest in a pluralistic world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dutil, P. A., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2008). Rethinking government- public relationships in a digital world: Customers, clients, or citizens? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680802149611
Goldberg, I., Goddard, J. G., Kuriakose, S., & Racine, J. L. (2011). Igniting innovation: Rethinking the role of government in emerging Europe and Central Asia. World Bank Publications.
Kaufmann, D. (2003). Rethinking governance: Empirical lessons challenge orthodoxy. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.386904
Lee, A. D., & Usman, Z. (2018). Taking stock of the political economy of power sector reforms in developing countries: A literature review. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8518). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8518
Markos, S. (2013). Civil service reform in Ethiopia: Issues, lessons, and future directions. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(4), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.757618
Mashaw, J. (2010). Public law and public choice: Critique and rapprochement. In D.
A. Farber & A. J. O’Connell (Eds.), Research handbook on public choice and
public law (pp. 19–45). Edward Elgar Publishing.
McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy.
Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mulligan, D. K., & Bamberger, K. A. (2018). Saving governance-by-design. California Law Review, 106(3), 697–784. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z384X54F88
O’Connell, A. J. (2010). Research handbook on public choice and public law. In D.
A. Farber (Ed.), Research handbook on public choice and public law (p. 7). Edward Elgar.
Onodugo, V. A., Nwakoby, I., Ofoegbu, G. N., Egbo, O. P., & Okoyeuzu, C. (2021). Empirical assessment of public sector reform in Nigeria: A trend analysis between 2000 and 2015. African Journal of Business and Economic Development, 2782, 7658.
Plummer, J., & Slaymaker, T. (2007). Rethinking governance in water services.
Overseas Development Institute.
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (8th ed.). Routledge.
Sneha, P., Sinha, N., Varghese, A., Durani, A., & Patel, A. (2021). Bureaucratic indecision and risk aversion in India. Indian Public Policy Review, 2(6), 55–87. Stevens, M., & Teggemann, S. (2004). Comparative experience with public service reform in Ghana, Tanzania, and Zambia. In B. Levy & S. Kpundeh (Eds.), Building state capacity in Africa: New approaches, emerging lessons (pp. 43–
86). World Bank.
van der Meer, F. M., & Dijkstra, G. (2021). Incentives and obstacles to the public sector and civil service reform: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Public Governance, 58(4), 5–16.
Verheijen, T. (2007). Administrative capacity in the new EU member states: The limits of innovation? In T. Verheijen (Ed.), Administrative capacity in the new EU member states (pp. 1–25). World Bank.
Wright, V. (2019). Reshaping the state: The implications for public administration.
In G. Smith (Ed.), The state in Western Europe (pp. 102–137). Routledge.
Yanguas, P., & Bukenya, B. (2016). ‘New’ approaches confront ‘old’ challenges in African public sector reform. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1108828
